Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01709
Original file (BC 2014 01709.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF: 	DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01709
					COUNSEL:  NONE
		HEARING DESIRED:  NO 


APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

He was on flying status as a crew chief.

He be awarded the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), the Republic of 
Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVCM) and any additional medals he may 
be entitled for serving in Vietnam.


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He was a flying crew chief and made weekly trips from the Dover 
AFB to air bases in Vietnam, between 1966 and 1969.  However, 
his records does not credit him with these flights 

He’s not certain how flight records are maintained; however, 
there should be records of crews flying to Vietnam during the 
aforementioned period.  His medical records confirmed that he 
was cleared for flight duty.   

The applicant provides no rationale as to why his failure to 
timely file should be waived in the interest of justice.  

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 8 Jan 57, the applicant initially entered the Regular Air 
Force.

According to an AF Form 910, TSgt, SSgt, and A1C Performance 
Report, rendered for the period 24 May 66 – 23 May 67, the 
applicant supervised a mission, in Mar 67, to Southeast Asia.

On 1 Oct 78, the applicant was retired.  He was credited with 
21 years, 11 months, and 20 days of active service.   

DPSID will administratively correct the applicant’s record to 
reflect award of the Non-Commissioned Officer Professional 
Military Education Graduate Ribbon (NCOPMEGR) and the Air Force 
Outstanding Unit Award, with Four Bronze Oak Leaf Clusters, 
(AFOUA, w/4BOLCs, upon final Board action.



AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AF/A3O-A1F recommends denial of the applicant’s request to show 
that he was on flying status as a crew member.  Based on the 
documentation provided, the applicant did not hold a Duty Air 
Force Specialty Code (DAFSC) with an “A” prefix which would have 
allowed him to be placed on flying status as a crew member and 
eligible for an Aircrew Member Badge.  

The complete A3O-A1F evaluation is at Exhibit C.

AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial for service in Vietnam.  A review 
of the information provided and the master personnel record 
failed to provide any documents that substantiate foreign 
service in Vietnam. 

The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit D.

AFPC/DPSID recommends denial for award of the VSM and the RVCM.  
DPSID did not find any official documentation in the applicant's 
record to verify he was attached or assigned to a unit for one 
or more days or served on temporary duty for 30 consecutive days 
or 60 nonconsecutive days in the area of eligibility for award 
of the VSM. 

In addition, there is no official documentation in the 
applicant's record to verify he was in the area of eligibility 
for an aggregate of 6 months for award of the RVCM.  DPAPP was 
unable to verify the applicant as having served in Vietnam; 
therefore, rendering him ineligible for award of the VSM and the 
RVCM.  

The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit E.


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

He was stationed at Dover AFB, DE from Jul 66 to Jul 69.  He and 
many other C-14 crew chiefs were required to fly with their 
aircraft on missions to Vietnam and back.  He is requesting his 
pay statements from the Defense Finance and Accounting Service 
(DFAS) for the period of Jul 66 to Jul 69. 


The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit G.  


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took 
notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and 
recommendation of the Air Force offices of primary 
responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our 
conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error of 
injustice.  We note the applicant indicates that he is 
requesting additional evidence, should the applicant provide 
evidence such as temporary duty orders and travel vouchers to 
substantiate his claim, we would be willing to reconsider his 
request.  Aside from the administrative corrections noted above, 
we find no basis to recommend granting the requested relief.


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application.


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2014-01709 in Executive Session on 26 Feb 15 under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	, Panel Chair
	, Member
	, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 21 Apr 14, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Pertinent Excerpts from Personnel Records.
	Exhibit C.  Letter, AF/3O-A1F, dated 13 Jun 14.
Exhibit D.  Letter, AFPC/DPAPP, dated 29 Jul 14.
Exhibit E.  Letter, AFPC/DPSID, dated 22 Sep 14.
Exhibit F.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 20 Oct 14.
Exhibit G.  Letter, Applicant, dated 8 Nov 14, w/atchs.

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01190

    Original file (BC 2014 01190.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 12 May 14, AFPC/DPAPP informed the applicant that after a review of his records and the documents he provided, they were able to verify and confirm his boots on ground foreign service time at DaNang Air Base, Republic of Vietnam, from 12 Jan 67 to 13 May 67, for 4 months and 1 day. Such permanent award will be entered in the AF Form 7 of individuals so entitled.” Based on the documentation provided by the applicant, he was designated as a crew member per AO-11, effective 23 Jun 65. We...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03890

    Original file (BC-2012-03890.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03890 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be corrected to reflect he was awarded the following: a. Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He served in Guam with the 3960th Strategic Wing for 176...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00408

    Original file (BC 2014 00408.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit E. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He served for a little less than four years because of hazardous missions flown in SEA. While the applicant has not provided conclusive evidence that he completed a TDY to Vietnam, it is our opinion the APR for the period ending 27 Sep 68 coupled with AFPS’s database appear to weigh more in favor of amending the applicant’s DD Form 214 to reflect award of the VSM with one Bronze Service Star...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05257

    Original file (BC 2013 05257.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05257 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVCM). There is no official documentation in the applicant’s official military record verifying he was in the area of eligibility for an aggregate of six months in support of the Vietnam Armed Forces. While the applicant contends that the fact that he was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00054

    Original file (BC 2014 00054.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, personnel serving in Thailand, Laos, or Cambodia in direct support of operations in Vietnam during the same time period were also eligible for the VSM. A thorough review of the applicant’s official military record did not locate any documentation verifying award of the VSM. The applicant provided TDY Order-Military, dated 24 Jan 67 assigning him to the 4133rd Bomb Wing (Provisional), Anderson Air Force Base (AFB), Guam; TDY Order-military, dated 22 Feb 68, assigning him to the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-05113

    Original file (BC-2011-05113.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Only members who meet the criteria for the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (Vietnam) or VSM during the period of service are considered to have contributed direct combat support to the RVN armed forces. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02163

    Original file (BC 2013 02163.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02163 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect award of the Korean Service Medal (KSM) and Air Force Crew Wings. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04655

    Original file (BC-2011-04655.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR) which are included at Exhibits C and D. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial of the applicant’s requests...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02610

    Original file (BC 2013 02610.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    _______________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicant’s requests for the VSM, RVGC w/P, PUC, VCM, KSM, NATO Medal, Cold War Medal, AFOR-L and AFOR-S. DPSID was unable to locate any documentation in the applicant’s records verifying he served in Vietnam or an area of eligibility for award of the VSM, RVGC w/P or VCM. In regards to the list of medals and unit awards, he was seeking help in finding out whether any...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04635

    Original file (BC-2011-04635.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The RVCM is awarded to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who: served for six months in South Vietnam during the period 1 March 1961 and 28 March 1973; or served outside the geographical limits of South Vietnam and contributed direct combat support to the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) Armed Forces for an aggregate of six months. DPSIDR verified the applicant is entitled to the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award with V device and one Oak Leaf Cluster (OLC) and the Republic of Vietnam...